Printable View
For those of you not on Facebook I present the ULE EyeMag.
Xmag lowers, Luke’s Gumshoe rail, ULE body milled for dual detent, X, board and eye by Sci-fi, mill work BMC fabrication. was super low on air but needed to test it so the firing video isn't impressive... but shows it works! video at the bottom, need to click.
https://i.imgur.com/REJ7l6G.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/8fwQQLp.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/ocNApx1.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/bdynmT4.jpg
video https://i.imgur.com/wjBD4b9.mp4
No pic:(
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
yeah difficult to add them from my phone.... They are there now! video link as well.
Sweet Emag. I saw it on Facebook.
Brandon’s local to me and has done amazing work on my Mags.
Also, that is the Lc “Gumshoe” rail.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I know it’s a gumshoe….. for some reason I always type boxcar! I’ll fix, thanks. Did the same thing on my FB post.... fixed it before anyone said anything lol.
Lol!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by AirAssault
I can relate with that one.
I’ve got a couple (8” and 9.1”) and use to call them “shoebox” rail.
Haha!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I like that better :)Quote:
Originally Posted by awo702
Haven't you heard of Level 10? Works better than any eye ever could. ;)
I was hearing rumblings that the Emags were feeling discriminated against because Xmags got an eye and they didn't. I'm all about eye equality.
... Why?
A properly tuned lvl10 makes the eye irrelevant
Sent from my motorola edge 5G UW (2021) using Tapatalk
Because the debate is that with an eye, you can cycle the bolt faster and tune the valve for better efficiency. As great as the L10 is, it sucks at efficiency. So do you want cps/bps and better gas efficiency, or do you want a mechanical anti-chop and poor gas efficiency? The debate continues...Quote:
Originally Posted by trbo323
Guess that makes some senseQuote:
Originally Posted by Nobody
Sent from my motorola edge 5G UW (2021) using Tapatalk
Because eye can :cool:
well, others can and I can pay them lol.