Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Wiffle Paintballs

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Jeet yet ?
    Posts
    8,139

    Question Wiffle Paintballs

    http://atomicpickle.industries







    Data :


    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...ng4/edit#gid=0



    We play year round here but indoor in cold climates ?


    What say you ?




  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    West By God Virginia
    Posts
    3,405
    Interesting

  3. #3
    What type of velocity? The issue is going to be the "airsoft" quotient. (No mark means hit didn't count)
    From a poster at PB Nation:

    ""Jim, back to your cave. Bob Long is on the batphone..."

    MY FEEDBACK

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Jeet yet ?
    Posts
    8,139
    Quote Originally Posted by cledford View Post
    What type of velocity? The issue is going to be the "airsoft" quotient. (No mark means hit didn't count)
    Its all in the Google docs spreadsheet. click the link in the op.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by cledford View Post
    What type of velocity?
    They seem to be bragging that the round has 80% less impact energy at 15ft than a traditional paintball.

    I'm looking at the velocity #'s and seeing that a traditional paintball loses ~15% of its velocity by 15ft. Their round loses ~33% of its velocity by 15ft.
    That's not okay.

  6. #6
    Oh, paintballs with their own barrel porting. I don't see this working at all.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    West By God Virginia
    Posts
    3,405
    Quote Originally Posted by bowcycle View Post
    They seem to be bragging that the round has 80% less impact energy at 15ft than a traditional paintball.

    I'm looking at the velocity #'s and seeing that a traditional paintball loses ~15% of its velocity by 15ft. Their round loses ~33% of its velocity by 15ft.
    That's not okay.
    Why not ,, seems to made for Low Impact Indoor play

  8. #8
    those are made from a horrible matterial lol

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Jeet yet ?
    Posts
    8,139
    Quote Originally Posted by knownothingmags View Post
    those are made from a horrible matterial lol
    I'm guessing he probably used the least expensive material he could get.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by going_home View Post
    I'm guessing he probably used the least expensive material he could get.
    i didnt put much thought into that post.
    its a good idea if the perform for a market that exists.
    always have to try somewhere

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Don' ask questions. It is considered "trolling" in some locations.
    Posts
    4,266
    I wonder how it works with markers with eyes.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    460
    Quote Originally Posted by bowcycle View Post
    They seem to be bragging that the round has 80% less impact energy at 15ft than a traditional paintball.

    I'm looking at the velocity #'s and seeing that a traditional paintball loses ~15% of its velocity by 15ft. Their round loses ~33% of its velocity by 15ft.
    That's not okay.
    Yeah. The inference being that an Atom6 hits the ground at 25 feet. That makes for a lot of point blank showdowns, and reduces the "off season training appeal" for paintball because the play style is not longer an accurate analogue.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Jeet yet ?
    Posts
    8,139
    Quote Originally Posted by MANN View Post
    I wonder how it works with markers with eyes.
    Good question.

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by going_home View Post
    I'm guessing he probably used the least expensive material he could get.
    he used a soft 3d printable material, there aren't a lot of choices for that right now but if he gets a mold made he could have them molded with whatever durometer he wanted. just guessing these are maybe 40A and I think reball material is about a 60A but since these are like a wiffle ball they could be made a bit harder.


    Quote Originally Posted by going_home View Post
    Good question.
    I got a couple to test and they seem to work fine with eyes. one guy said he had a little trouble though. the problem is I only have 2 of them so it's hard to tell. eventually someone will get a hopper full and we will see.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Jeet yet ?
    Posts
    8,139
    Interesting

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Inception Designs HQ
    Posts
    3,084
    Quote Originally Posted by going_home View Post
    Interesting
    No not really. Unless it was perfectly seated in the breech, and the eyes passed through the segments; you will still block the eye in some way. Reflective eyes, might be a problem, but they were always screwy to begin with.

  17. #17
    if anyone is interested Atomic Pickle posted a video comparing them to paintballs and reballs vs drywall. no damage, they didn't seem to leave any mark on my plaster walls at home either.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29yWa_Q5W3c

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    West By God Virginia
    Posts
    3,405
    no reason for eyes anyway , no ball breaks

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Inception Designs HQ
    Posts
    3,084
    Quote Originally Posted by maniacmechanic View Post
    no reason for eyes anyway , no ball breaks
    Some guns have eyes (PE, SP/Luxe, Dye, Empire/GI, Bob Longg, etc) that youcould turn them off, it can effect things like RoF (which could be set to a lower RoF than with eyes to prevent possible ball breaks because of a problem), and this shouldn't for just one type of gun (mechanical) but for all.

    Also, to help diagnose guns indoors(where low impact will be useful to those that don't have yards or soace to shoot paint), having the eyes
    on best helps finding a possible problem in the gun. Yes, a L10 gun doesn't break paint, yet not every gun has that yet.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Jeet yet ?
    Posts
    8,139
    Quote Originally Posted by hathegkla View Post
    if anyone is interested Atomic Pickle posted a video comparing them to paintballs and reballs vs drywall. no damage, they didn't seem to leave any mark on my plaster walls at home either.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29yWa_Q5W3c


    Serious paintball marker is serious.....





Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •